3D Printed Polymers for Medical Devices: a Public Health Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36489/saudecoletiva.2025v16i103p18184-18193Keywords:
Polymers, Three-dimensional printing, Public health, Tubular prostheses, BiocompatibilityAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop prototypes of tubular medical devices using 3D printing of polymers, evaluating their technical-scientific feasibility and potential application in the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS), with a view to contributing to the incorporation of this technology within the scope of Brazilian public health. METHOD: Experimental study using commercial polymers (TPU Flex, Nylon, Tritan, PLA Flex and ABS) processed by FDM printing. The prototypes were developed using CAD modeling and characterized by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), with comparative parameters established from commercial JOTEC devices. Results: The TPU flex 98A prototypes showed the best performance, especially in terms of flexibility and surface homogeneity. Conclusion: 3D printing of commercial polymers represents a technologically viable alternative for the production of personalized medical devices, with potential impact on Brazilian public health through technological independence.
References
Callister WD, Rethwisch DG. Ciência e Engenharia de Materiais: Uma Introdução. 9ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: LTC; 2017.
Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons JE. Biomaterials Science: An Introduction to Materials in Medicine. 4th ed. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2020.
Heim F, Durand B, Chakfé N. Textile Heart Valve Prosthesis: The Effect of Fabric Construction on the Latex Sizing and Performance. Textile Research Journal. 2010;80(13):1303-1313.
Ventola CL. Medical Applications for 3D Printing: Current and Projected Uses. P T. 2014;39(10):704-711.
Tack P, Victor J, Gemmel P, Annemans L. 3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review. Biomed Eng Online. 2016;15(1):115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-016-0236-4
Oliveira MVB, Freitas EDS, Silva JVL, Noritomi PY. A Impressão 3D no Contexto da Saúde no Brasil: Potencialidades e Desafios. Revista de Engenharia Biomédica. 2021;25(2):45-58.
Li P, Li Z, Yang L, Hou J, Wang C, Tang W. The application of 3D printing in medicine: a review. Ann Transl Med. 2022;10(18):1016.
Martelli N, Serrano C, van den Brink H, Pineau J, Prognon P, Borget I, et al. Advantages and disadvantages of 3-dimensional printing in surgery: A systematic review. Surgery. 2016;159(6):1485-1500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.12.017
Gibson I, Rosen D, Stucker B. Additive manufacturing technologies: 3D printing, rapid prototyping, and direct digital manufacturing. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3
Tack P, Victor J, Gemmel P, Annemans L. 3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review. Biomed Eng Online. 2016;15(1):115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-016-0236-4
Valvez S, Reis PNB, Susmel L, Berto F. Fused deposition modeling of polymers: a review. Adv Eng Mater. 2022;24(10):2100873.
Christ S, Schnabel M, Vorndran E, Groll J, Gbureck U. Fiber reinforcement during 3D printing of filaments with flexible materials. Mater Lett. 2017;207:1-4.
Goh GD, Yap YL, Agarwala S, Yeong WY. Recent progress in additive manufacturing of fiber reinforced polymer composite. Adv Mater Technol. 2019;4(1):1800271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.201800271
Wang X, Jiang M, Zhou Z, Gou J, Hui D. 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: a review and prospective. Compos Part B Eng. 2017;110:442-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034
Li P, Li Z, Yang L, Hou J, Wang C, Tang W. The application of 3D printing in medicine: a review. Ann Transl Med. 2022;10(18):1016.








