Clinical Risks, Ethical and the Weakness of Scientific Evidence

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36489/saudecoletiva.2025v16i102p12122-12133

Keywords:

Evidence-Based Medicine, Ethics Medical, Fluid Therapy, Parenteral Nutrition, Dietary Supplements

Abstract

Serotherapy, the intravenous infusion of nutrients, has gained popularity as an aesthetic and wellness practice, although scientific evidence supporting its efficacy and safety is lacking. This study analyzed the clinical risks and ethical implications of using serotherapy without medical indication through an integrative literature review. Results show that infusion is not superior to oral supplementation and may cause hypervitaminosis, local and systemic adverse reactions, as well as severe complications. Its use without scientific support constitutes a potential ethical violation, possibly qualifying as unauthorized practice or quackery. It is concluded that serotherapy should be limited to cases with proven clinical indication and performed under the supervision of a qualified professional.

References

Conrad P. A medicalização da sociedade: em defesa da razão. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz; 2019.

Ventola CL. Social media and health care professionals: benefits, risks, and best practices. Pharmacy and Therapeutics. 2014;39(7):491-520.

Martins TF, Pimentel JR, Melo GS. Propagação de práticas sem respaldo científico nas redes sociais: o caso da soroterapia. Rev Saúde Pública. 2023;57:e43.

Dunbar L, Chen J, Patel S, Nguyen A, Foster K. Intravenous vitamin therapy in healthy individuals: is there evidence? Clin Nutr. 2023.

Karasiewicz M, Nowak A, Zielińska K, Kowalczyk D, Wierzbicka-Rucińska A. Risks of high-dose vitamin infusions in clinical practice: a systematic review. Nutrients. 2024. doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000004396

Mayo Clinic. IV Vitamin Therapy: Understanding the Lack of Proven Benefit and Potential Risks of This Health Fad [Internet]. Rochester (MN): Mayo Clinic Press; 2023 [cited 2025 Oct 17]. Available from: https://mcpress.mayoclinic.org/living-well/iv-vitamin-therapy-understanding-the-lack-of-proven-benefit-and-potential-risks-of-this-health-fad/

World Health Organization (WHO). Global guidance on criteria and standards for ethical promotion of medicines [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2022 [cited 2025 Oct 17]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240063611

Conselho Federal de Medicina (Brasil). Resolução CFM nº 1.974/2011: dispõe sobre a publicidade médica [Internet]. Brasília: CFM; 2011 [cited 2025 Oct 17]. Available from: https://portal.cfm.org.br/images/stories/pdf/resolucao1974.pdf

Strech D. The REIGN Framework for Ethical Clinical Decision-Making in Evidence-Based Medicine. BMC Med Ethics. 2025;26(1):112. doi:10.1186/s12910-025-01121-8

Martínez MR, Silva AP, Oliveira TFM, Santos JB, Costa LMA. A influência das redes sociais na saúde dos seus usuários: uma revisão narrativa. Recima21 – Revista Científica Multidisciplinar. 2022;3(7):e1678. doi: 10.47820/recima21.v3i7.1678

Associação Brasileira de Nutrologia (ABRAN). Posicionamento ABRAN sobre a soroterapia para fins estéticos [Internet]. São Paulo: ABRAN; 2022 [cited 2025 Oct 17]. Available from: https://abran.org.br/publicacoes/posicionamento/posicionamento-abran-sobre-a-soroterapia-para-fins-esteticos.

Conselho Federal de Medicina. Resolução nº 2.217/2018 – Código de Ética Médica. Diário Oficial da União (Brasília). 2019.

UOL. Gestante morre após tomar coquetel de vitaminas em Cuiabá; CRM pede investigação [Internet]. São Paulo: UOL; 2023 [cited 2025 Jul 17]. Available from: https://www.uol.com.br/vivabem/noticias/redacao/2023/04/06/choque-anafilatico-coquetel-de-vitaminas-veja-cuidados-e-o-que-funciona.htm

G1. Idoso de 86 anos morre durante soroterapia em clínica particular de SC [Internet]. Santa Catarina: G1; 2025 Apr 16 [cited 2025 Oct 17]. Available from: https://g1.globo.com/sc/santa-catarina/noticia/2025/04/16/idoso-de-86-anos-morre-durante-soroterapia-em-clinica-particular-de-sc.ghtm

Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA). Nota Técnica nº 15/2022 – GGMED/GGPAF/ANVISA [Internet]. Brasília: ANVISA; 2022 [cited 2025 Sep 15]. Available from: https://www.gov.br/anvisa/pt-br/assuntos/medicamentos/notas-tecnicas

Blease C. Placebos and nocebos in clinical practice: from mechanisms to ethics. Am J Bioeth. 2024;24(2):45-52. doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2018.07.031

Doukas DJ. Teaching medical ethics in the digital age: conflict of interest and transparency. J Med Ethics. 2023;49(3):189-92. doi:10.1136/jme-2022-108715

Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Judicialização da Saúde no Brasil. Brasília (DF): Ministério da Saúde; 2013.

Schmidt MI, Ramos LR. O impacto da judicialização na atenção à saúde. Ciênc Saúde Colet. 2022;27(4):1234-42. doi:10.1590/1413-81232022274.17672021

Evans JA, Kim A. Intravenous vitamin injections: where is the evidence? Drug Ther Bull. 2023;61(10):151.

Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin (DTB). Intravenous vitamin injections: where is the evidence? BMJ. 2023;61(10):151-2. doi:10.1136/dtb.2023.000151

Williamson L, Castro MJ. Consumer Intravenous Vitamin Therapy: Wellness Boost or Toxicity Threat? Altern Ther Health Med. 2022;28(4):22-9. doi:10.1177/15332101221100050

Published

2025-12-02

How to Cite

Mattos, A. P. R. de, Luz, D. L., Ribeiro, M. B. P. de A., Camera, P. A. P., & Alves, C. M. (2025). Clinical Risks, Ethical and the Weakness of Scientific Evidence. Sa´úde Coletiva (Barueri), 16(102), 12122–12133. https://doi.org/10.36489/saudecoletiva.2025v16i102p12122-12133

Issue

Section

Scientfic Articles